Secure by architecture

Confidentiality is enforced by structure, not by trusting a model to behave.

Osseus mirrors the confidentiality rules your company already enforces. Each agent connects only to the systems, records, and memories its owner is permitted to access.

Control mappings and documentation for SOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001 and 42001, HIPAA, and GDPR are available on request.

Review compliance controls → Talk to us about security Visit Trust Centre

Three enforced boundaries

Your rules stay in control from source to answer.

Each layer blocks a different failure mode: unauthorized retrieval, context leaking between people or clients, and losing control of where your data runs.

Confidentiality rules

Your existing confidentiality rules govern every answer.

Osseus mirrors the access rules already enforced by your identity provider and connected systems. Each agent can retrieve only what its owner is allowed to access. Private context never enters shared memory unless your rules explicitly allow it; every move defaults to deny and is logged for audit.

Permission isolation

Every person and client workspace has its own permission boundary.

Each person has their own agent and memory, while approved context moves normally between people who share clearance. When clearances differ, Osseus limits each agent to its owner’s access and prevents one client’s records from entering another client’s answer.

Permission ladder

Memory expands only through explicit permission.

These scopes add controlled sharing around the access rules enforced by your identity provider and connected source systems. Osseus does not replace either.

Personal memory

Private to one person’s agent. Retrieval remains limited to records that person can access in connected source systems.

Private by default
Team memory

Approved context shared with a defined team. Membership and the underlying source-system permissions still limit who can retrieve it.

Defined members
Organization memory

Approved institutional knowledge for authorized people across the organization. Restricted source records remain restricted.

Authorized roles
External workspace

An isolated collaboration boundary for one partner and purpose. A CRO or vendor sees only study context explicitly shared into its own workspace; internal portfolio context, other studies, and other partners stay outside.

Explicitly shared

Sharing is default-deny. Nothing moves from personal into team, organization, or external scope automatically. Each move is checked against source, sensitivity, destination membership, and current permissions; if it is not explicitly allowed, the context stays in its existing scope.

Security in practice

Same question. Different clearance. Different answer.

Each agent retrieves only what its owner can already access. Restricted evidence never crosses the permission boundary.

One question · two clearances

“What happened with the v3 bracket fatigue test?”

Priya and Marcus ask their own agents the exact same thing.

Priya N.

Cleared on project

It failed overnight: a fatigue crack opened at the fillet under the 5 kN load case. Here’s the full report and the raw data, and I’ve flagged it for the v3 design review.

Teamcenter · Full FEA report Raw strain-gauge data

Marcus

Not cleared

The v3 team logged a test update overnight; here’s the program’s shared summary. My access is scoped to Marcus’s permissions, so the restricted structures results aren’t available to me. Priya N. is the right person if you need more.

Program v3 · shared summary 2 files outside Marcus’s clearance

Same question, different answers: each agent can access only what its owner is cleared to see, mirrored from your source-system permissions.

Security frameworks & privacy requirements.

We map controls and documentation to the standards your security team reviews. Reports, questionnaires, and policy evidence are available upon request and shared under NDA.

Request security documentation →